Monday, September 21, 2009

Chapter 2 - Jesus' Birth and Early Years


Ah yes! - the Why? and the How?

Why was Jesus Baptized? If you listen closely, someone always has something to offer the conversation. Drane points a fairly significant challenge with which many of us may wrestle. If Jesus is the God-Man, if He is perfectly holy, and John's baptism was of repentance - well then, "what could [Jesus] possible have to repent of?" (p. 54) I've heard that Jesus' baptism was a witness for John the Baptist and those nearby. I've heard that Jesus did it to set an example for His disciples to follow. Drane examines the idea that Jesus wanted to identify with the regular people He came to save and who would need to make sweeping changes in their lives. It strikes me that later in the Scriptures we find that Jesus not only was cursed for us and took on our sin, but that He was that curse (Gal. 3:13) and that He became sin (2 Cor. 5:21) so that folks like us could be saved. Now, I haven't worked it all out - but I think the weight of the world's sin on Christ's shoulders has something to do with Him identifying with you and me in the Baptismal waters.

Maybe more on that another day...

WARNING: The following images may contain useless rhetoric that may offend some viewers. Viewer discretion is advised.

Okay - I am no master of the theological arts, but I have a fairly basic (it's gotta be grade 2 or 3 anyway) understanding of theology - and it comes with two premises: 1) God is real - He ain't made up or debatable - He just is! 2) You and I and everybody are His inventions - He made us and loves us so much that He has chosen to reveal Himself to us in various ways. Two of these are the Bible and His own personal flesh and blood Son, Jesus - yet other ways remain.

Right then, with that out of the way - on to the "How?" Which how? The "How did Mary end up pregnant with Jesus?"

So, because it's my belief that God has chosen to reveal Himself to us through His Son and His word, I believe Matthew and Luke on the matter of the virgin birth. But then again, I believe Adam was the real, first man who once walked the earth and who got kicked out of the garden. I'm going to start with Matthew - he doesn't just say that Jesus was "born of the Virgin Mary," (you pick your favorite Apostles' Creed) he begins by explaining to us how she became pregnant to start with.

Now the birth of Jesus the Messiah took place in this way. When his Mother Mary had been engaged to Joseph, but before they lived together, she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. (Matthew 1:18, NRSV)

We aren't left guessing as though this is some mystery. Drane points out that some folks have trouble with the idea that "to be a virgin and pregnant is a contradiction in terms - so how can these stories be understood?" (p. 58) The author reminds us that there are many people who are unable to believe in anything outside their own experience. Even Luke didn't leave the immaculate conception up to the imagination. He tells us of a visit Mary had from the angel Gabriel.

The angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High...Mary said to the angel, "How can this be, since I am a virgin?" The angel said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called the Son of God." (Luke 1:30-32, 34-35, NRSV)

So Jesus is the direct-line Son of God; He was conceived by the Holy Spirit. Drane points out that some people (it seems he may be included) find it surprising that aside from "Matthew and Luke, there is no explicit statement in the whole of the rest of the New Testament regarding the circumstances of Jesus' conception and birth." (p. 59) Well, aside from the one mention in John 13, you'll find no other mention of Jesus washing His disciples' feet - so I guess we should doubt that episode too! And speaking of John - didn't he record Jesus' words to Nicodemus as, "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (St. John 3:16, KJV, emphasis added). I'll let you look up the word "beget / begotten" - http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=6746&dict=CALD

Do I doubt that we've been to the moon? - maybe, just a little.
Do I doubt that anyone will ever figure out how they get the caramel into the Caramilk bar? - yup.
Do I doubt that Elvis has truly left the building? - you'd better believe it!!

But, do I doubt that "Lord Jesus Christ [is] the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father; by whom all things were made; who, for us men [sic] and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary, and was made a man?" - not even for the slightest measure of time.

4 comments:

  1. good post Paul, and this is the type of discussion I hope the blogs will help us have, so let me play devil's advocate.
    You compare Jesus washing the disciples feet to the virgin birth. This seems to me to be apples and oranges. The virgin birth is more on par with the resurrection. Now, the resurrection permeates all of the NT. Now, believing as I do in the virgin birth and the resurrection, I have to wonder, why in the world wasn't this more of a headline in the NT?! I mean, this is a huge thing that directly links Jesus to God himself. It would seem to me that it would form part of the core of the gospel— virgin birth, death, resurrection. Yet, in most of the NT, the core of the gospel is— death, resurrection.

    Your thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Danny - you know, I had never tied the immaculate conception together with His resurrection before, but I really dig what I think you're saying. It's one of those ah-ha moments - Of course, these "moments" in Christ's life have no choice but to point to who He is.

    I'm not sure why the evangelists didn't make more about it. I don't even want to make a pubic guess ;-) Do you know of any extra-biblical material that talks about the virgin birth?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'll let y'all find the typo in my reply..."public"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow, the whole virgin birth thing turns out to be quite a debate as I've looked into it further. This is a great topic to debate and discuss!

    There are many thoughts on this as far as I've researched - a mistranslation from Hebrew to Greek of the word "virgin", people dismissing the Isaiah 7 prophecy as referring to Jesus, some feel that the "silence" on this issue is grounds to dismiss it, and more! Wow!

    I would really like to dig into this more as my commentary in my Bible states that this is key to our Christian faith; "Jesus had to be free from the sinful nature passed on to all other human beings by Adam. Because he was born of a woman, he was a human being; but as the Son of God, Jesus was born without any trace of human sin..." (Life Application Study Bible)

    Let's continue the conversation!

    ReplyDelete